(A
unique experience in Lent 2012)
It was just few days
after Ash Wednesday, which marks the first day of the Christian Lent that I visited
my nani (maternal granny) with mom. I had long not visited her, but mom had not
seen her for even longer. She had informed nani an evening before that we would
be visiting her the following day, and that she need not bother to cook multiple
items (as a sign of her obvious love for her children coming to home) because
as it is she alone would eat with her as I was fasting, and one simple dish
would suffice.
As we reached home some
time around lunch, after a warm reception, she set the table with the mouth
watering items she had cooked for us. Compelled by her habit of doing this, she
had done it for her two daughters. As a usual practice, she had also prepared the
relishing chicken. I had to first tell her that I was fasting for Easter and
would not eat anything. To make her feel a little better, I asked her to pack the
food for me, but not chicken, to have it in dinner. She could not comprehend
what I said at first, and then mom had to translate that in Malayalam, as to
why I wouldn’t eat. Not that she wasn’t aware of the Easter Lent, but for her
it was us coming to see her after many months.
Now, I saw her anticipated
joy (in feeding me) go down her face, even while mom was anyway going to give
her company. She couldn’t have been so depressed over anything other than me
not eating the meal she prepared (at this age) with so much love, and
difficulty of course (for she herself goes to buy vegetables and chicken and
everything) with her walking stick.
All throughout, I was upset seeing her disappointed and kept wondering and questioning myself,
if by not having the food and the specially prepared chicken, making her feel bad about it, I was actually keeping
in with the tradition ritualistic aspect of Lent! I can’t word the unrest
within me then. At this moment, in a short duration, I reflected upon the
figure of Jesus, and became all the more convinced that doing so would ruin the
very essence and meaning of fasting. I learnt that making her (or anyone) sad
and then fasting the whole day would not be a successful lent. I grasped that
this is not what I have been expected to do, even though the Church wants us to
follow the traditional rites, yet, not necessarily, Jesus would also want the
same from me in this situation. I could not make an old lady upset and embarrassed
for what she did out of usual expression of love for her children. At this very
reasoning, with lot of grace felt inside me, I told nani to serve me lunch, and
at 1 o’clock, I broke the fast after a short prayer.
I did this in
exceptional circumstance, and later asked mom to explain to her the reason behind
my doing this. I know it wasn’t wrong because thereafter, I was so much at
peace with myself, and no guilt troubled me, which was a sign of what I did was
perhaps in accordance to what Jesus would have wanted me to do, for He alone is my inspiration. And, it is important I mention here that the way I choose to fast is not what is actually commanded by Church, i.e. completely abstaining from food and not taking water, but it is my desire to imitate Jesus to the extent I can, through different ways and actions (of course, I can't become like Him, but can atleast strive to be like Him).
So, at the very start
of the holy lent, I learnt what it means to fast, to follow Jesus, and not get
so tightly gripped in the traditional rites, that I become numb to others’
feelings and needs. Lent became meaningful for me thereon, when I understood that
Lent should reflect Christ’s personality, teachings and desires from my deeds,
and I should not observe Lent simply because institutional compulsions want me
to ‘to do so’ without understanding the quintessential meaning appended to it.
(I dedicate this article to the One who is eventually making me write it down, after much persuasion. I don’t want to keep this experience to myself alone, but want to share it with you).
Picture courtesy: loyolapress.com
No comments:
Post a Comment